Installation records, and how they are published
There are no published installation case studies on this site yet — and this page says so rather than filling the space with an illustrative one. What it carries instead is the policy: what qualifies as a record, what consent has to be in place before one is published, which fields a record contains, and how a dealer or installer can submit one. A case study without a named installation behind it is a story; this page exists so that the ones that appear here will not be.
Want to see how the units are made?
Photographs of the production process, not the finished installations — about the manufacturer.
Want to see what an installation involves?
The procedure and the drawings — installation guide.
Why the space below is not filled
Every supplier in this category has a case studies page, and a large proportion of them are written from the same template: a plausible municipality, a plausible flow rate, a before-and-after and no name. That format is cheap to produce and it is unfalsifiable, which is exactly why it is not used here. A buyer evaluating a component for a technical file needs records that can be checked, not narratives that cannot.
What this page does instead
- States plainly that no records are published yet.
- Sets out the criteria a record has to meet to be published at all.
- Lists the consent that has to exist before anything identifying an installation or a counterparty appears.
- Publishes the field list, so a dealer can collect a submittable record during the install rather than months later.
What is deliberately missing
- No illustrative installations presented as real.
- No performance results, because there is no test report behind them — see the datasheets.
- No customer names or locations without written consent.
- No photographs of an installation without the site owner's permission, whatever the installer's own consent.
Where evidence does not exist, the page says so rather than supplying a plausible substitute. The same rule governs the performance figures, the lifetime figure and the certification table elsewhere on this site. It is a harder position to hold on a page like this one — an empty case studies page looks worse than a filled one — and it is still the right one.
What qualifies as a record
A record is published when it teaches a reader something they cannot get from the product pages, and when every claim in it can be traced to a document or a photograph. Both tests have to pass. The third requirement is mundane and the one most often skipped: the site owner has to have agreed to it.
| Criterion | Why it is required |
|---|---|
| A specific, identifiable installation | The record describes one system at one point in time, not a composite of typical cases. Where the site cannot be identified to us, it cannot be published as a record. |
| Written consent from the site owner | Necessary before any photograph, address, system detail or name appears. An installer's own consent does not cover a customer's premises. |
| Consent from the installer or dealer | Where the work is being credited, the party that did it is named with their agreement — or the record is published unattributed. |
| Documented feed-water values | Turbidity, iron, hardness and pH at the unit. Without them a reader cannot tell whether the record is relevant to their own water. |
| Documented installation detail | The position on the line, the model, the fitting size, the draw it was sized to, and the date. These are the fields a specifier actually compares against their own case. |
| No performance claim without a report | A record states what was installed and what was observed. It does not state an inactivation figure, a reduction claim or a dose value, because no report supports one. |
| Anonymisation where consent is partial | Where a site owner agrees to appear without being named, the record can be published with the location generalised to a region and no identifying detail — with that limitation stated in the record itself. |
What a published record will contain
Submitting a record
Records are submitted by the dealer or installer who carried out the work, or by the site owner. The most useful moment to collect the data is during commissioning, while the cabinet is still open and the test results are still in hand.
- Collect the field list during commissioning. Water values, model number, position on the line, fitting size, the draw it was sized to, and the date. A record assembled from memory six months later will be missing exactly the fields that make it useful.
- Take photographs before the cabinet is closed. One of the installed position showing the surrounding line, one of the nameplate. Photographs are optional for publication and necessary for the record to be verifiable.
- Obtain the site owner's written consent. A short statement is enough: what may be published, whether the location may be named, and whether photographs may be used. Where the site owner prefers not to be identified, the record can still be published with the location generalised.
- Send it in with the enquiry form. Note the model number and that the submission is an installation record — see contact.
- Review before publication. Every record is checked against the criteria above before it appears, including that nothing in it asserts a performance figure. Anything that cannot be traced to a document or a photograph is removed rather than softened.
Publication on this page, with attribution to the installer where they want it. It is not used as a testimonial, it is not edited into a marketing claim, and the site owner's consent can be withdrawn at any time — in which case the record comes down rather than being anonymised after the fact.
What can be examined in the meantime
An installation record answers “what did this look like somewhere else”. Until there are records to show, three other things answer most of the same questions and are already published.
Photographs of incoming inspection, clean-zone assembly, pressure holding and water testing — the points at which a unit is checked before it ships.
Where the unit sits on the line, how it is secured, and the faults that produce a working installation that changes nothing.
Both models parameter by parameter, including the documentation that exists and the figures that do not.
Installation records
Why are there no case studies published yet?
Because publishing one requires a specific identifiable installation, written consent from the site owner, documented feed-water values and documented installation detail — and the collection process for those records starts with this page. Filling the space with an illustrative case would be quicker and would tell a reader nothing they could check.
Can an installation record include performance results?
No. Records state what was installed and what was observed. They do not assert an inactivation figure, a reduction claim or a dose value, because no supporting report is held for the product — see the datasheets for the full position on what documentation exists.
Will a customer's name or address be published?
Only with that customer's written consent, and consent is recorded separately for the name, the location and any photographs. Where a site owner agrees to appear without being identified, the location is generalised to a region and that limitation is stated in the record itself.
Can I submit a record for a unit I fitted, if I am not a distributor?
Yes. Records are submitted by whoever carried out the work or by the site owner, and attribution to an installer is their choice. What is required is the field list and the consents — not a commercial relationship with the manufacturer.
What happens if a site owner withdraws consent later?
The record is removed rather than anonymised after the fact. Consent covers the version that was agreed to, and a record edited into a different version is not the one that was consented to.
Submit an installation record
Send the field list, the water values and the consents. Records submitted during commissioning arrive complete; records assembled months later usually arrive without the water values, which are the field that makes a case useful to someone else.
- Required: identifiable installation · site owner's written consent · feed-water values · model, position, fitting size, draw and date
- Optional: photographs of the installed position and the nameplate · installer attribution
- Not accepted: performance claims, illustrative cases, or anything that cannot be traced to a document or a photograph
- Withdrawal: consent can be withdrawn at any time and the record is removed
Send a record or an enquiry
Typical response within one business day.
This form is not yet connected to a mail service — the enquiry endpoint will be wired up at launch. Until then, write to sales@skweit.cn or through the contact page.
Sources and scope
5 sources
- No installation records are published on this site as at the date below. This page states the publication criteria and the submission route; it is not a catalogue of installations.
- Field list and consent requirements: this site's own publication policy, set out above. Consent is recorded separately for naming, location and photographs.
- Products referred to in records: model numbers
ZXSJ-UVC-1GPMandZXSJ-UVC-3GPM, as carried on the nameplate. See the series data sheet. - Certification status: CE conformity certificate DPCW/01068/06/KA/26 (INTERCERT Global), certificate holder Suzhou Purple Core Instant Purification Technology Co.,Ltd.; EPA Establishment registration No. 105777-CHN-1, a facility registration and not a product certification. No microbiological performance figure, log reduction or dose value is asserted anywhere on this site, and none is accepted into a record.
- Photographs published on this site of the production process are the manufacturer's own and are used to illustrate process only, not to attribute a manufacturing location. See about the manufacturer.